Buccal Clonazepam versus Intravenous (I/V) Midazolam for Management of Acute Breakthrough Seizure –A Randomized Controlled Trial
ثبت نشده
چکیده
Seizures are one of the commonest neurological symptoms seen in children. Recurrent seizures could ensue from epilepsy, febrile seizures, provoked seizures, drug inefficacy or with, or due to unknown or systemic illnesses [1]. A breakthrough seizure is an epileptic seizure that occurs, despite the use of anticonvulsants that have otherwise successfully prevented seizures in the patient. Breakthrough seizures may be more dangerous than nonbreakthrough seizures as they are less expected by the patient. Epileptics with a higher intensity of seizures are more likely to suffer from a breakthrough seizure. Rates of breakthrough seizures vary; studies have shown the rates of breakthrough seizures ranging from 11-37 % [2,3].
منابع مشابه
A Comparison of Buccal Midazolam and Intravenous Diazepam for the Acute Treatment of Seizures in Children
OBJECTIVE The purpose of the present study is to compare efficacy and safety of buccal midazolam with intravenous diazepam in control of seizures in Iranian children. METHODS This is a randomized clinical trial. 92 patients with acute seizures, ranging from 6 months to 14 years were randomly assigned to receive either buccal midazolam (32 cases) or intravenous diazepam (60 cases) at the emerg...
متن کاملIntramuscular midazolam versus intravenous diazepam for treatment of seizures in the pediatric emergency department: a randomized clinical trial.
AIM To compare the therapeutic efficacy of intramuscular midazolam (MDZ-IM) with that of intravenous diazepam (DZP-IV) for seizures in children. DESIGN Randomized clinical trial. SETTING Pediatric emergency department. PATIENTS Children aged 2 months to 14 years admitted to the study facility with seizures. INTERVENTION Patients were randomized to receive DZP-IV or MDZ-IM. MAIN MEASUR...
متن کاملIntranasal Midazolam Compared with Intravenous Diazepam in Patients Suffering from Acute Seizure: A Randomized Clinical Trial
OBJECTIVE Acute seizure attack is a stressful experience both for health care personnel and parents. These attacks might cause morbidity and mortality among patients, so reliable methods to control the seizure preferably at home should be developed. This study was performed to measure the time needed to control seizure attacks using intranasal midazolam compared to the common treatment (intrave...
متن کاملEffectiveness of intravenous lidocaine versus intravenous morphine in reducing acute extremity trauma-induced pain: A triple-blind randomized clinical trial
Introduction: The present study aimed to compare analgesic effects of IV lidocaine vs. IV morphine on the management and relief of acute pain caused by the extremity trauma. Materials and Methods: The present study was a triple-blind randomized clinical trial that was conducted in the emergency department of Peymanieh Hospital of Jahrom. Patients aged 16 to 65 with acute extremity traumas and t...
متن کاملEfficacy and usability of buccal midazolam in controlling acute prolonged convulsive seizures in children.
A Prolonged convulsive seizure is the most common neurological medical emergency with poor outcome. An ideal anticonvulsant should be easy-to-use, effective, and safe, and it should also have a long-lasting effect. Benzodiazepines, give via the intravenous or rectal route have generally been used as first-line drugs. In small children, IV access can be difficult and time consuming. Midazolam is...
متن کامل